Posted by: kingdomadvancer | May 7, 2008

Republican Hoosiers and Tar Heels Echo Pennsylvanians’ Sentiments

Digg this.

 

Even with many of the pundits auditioning for the role of the “Fat Lady” and Hillary Clinton riling up her supporters by promising to continue the fight after her crushing defeat in North Carolina and narrow victory in Indiana, the loudest clangor in John McCain’s ears is probably the echo reverberating from Pennsylvania throughout Indiana and North Carolina.

 

Despite being the presumptive nominee for over two months now, the Arizona Senator failed to rack up even three quarters of the vote in North Carolina after having experienced the same letdown in Pennsylvania on April 22. McCain barely scraped up three quarters of the vote in Indiana.

 

In Indiana, John McCain collected 77% of the vote in form of over 319,000 votes tallied. Mike Huckabee, who suspended his bid for the nomination on March 4,  came in second with over 41,000 (10%), while Ron Paul garnered upwards of 31,000 (8%) and Mitt Romney, who’s been out of the race for a month longer than Huckabee, managed 19,000 plus (5%).

 

In North Carolina, 381,000 and a handful more (74%) pulled the lever for McCain, while over 62,000 (12%) did so for Huckabee and another some 37,000 (7%) for Paul. More than 20,000 (4%) recorded that they had no preference. Romney wasn’t on the ballot, so many of those “no preference” votes are probably his, like those on the Democratic side were for Barack Obama and John Edwards in Michigan, where Hillary Clinton and the ever-competitive Dennis Kucinich were the only names on the ballot.

 

The point here is this: McCain has spent two months with almost no competition on the Republican side. He’s got less than six months left before the general election, and there are hundreds of thousands of voters who, for one reason or the other, consider it appropriate and necessary to cast their vote for a Republican not named McCain.

 

Of course, this doesn’t even account for those voters who may be “biting the bullet” and voting for McCain in the primaries for the sake of party unity, yet aren’t too excited about it and don’t plan to fight for him.

 

McCain has a little time and one monumental decision which will determine whether he can bring all these wandering sheep back into the fold. That momentous choice, of course, is that of his running mate. The question is this: Will any conservative do? Or does it need to be Mike Huckabee? Or does it need to be anyone but the former presidential candidates?  

 

I don’t have the answer to those questions. But it should be noted that few politicians have as strong and as well-known of reputations on issues such as life, marriage, the Second Amendment, and the Fair Tax as Huckabee has, not to mention his appeal to middle-class voters and Christian conservatives.  

 

Tell me what you think.

 

EDIT/UPDATE: The numbers have been slightly updated. My source has been CNN.

Responses

Being a voter for Mike in NC it was wonderful to go out and cast my vote for him yesterday. Mike received 238 votes for my county alone and over 60,000 votes in NC!!! There were over 4700 No Preference votes and I truly believe that if Mike would have been actively campaigning he would have taken NC! He’s still in this race because the voices of the people are saying that they prefer Mike by their votes.

McCain is clearly going to need help in the south and with the evangelical vote. Mike’s 10 1/2 years of political chief executive experience, consistent stand on moral values, his appeal to youth and black voters, and his grassroots support would be a major asset to McCain. McCain would be insane not to pick Huckabee as his VP.

I voted for Mike Huckabee and I don’t want him to be selected by McCain to serve as VP!

I like Huckabee far too much for him to get stained by a RINO like McCain.

As a “social conservative” who got tossed aside by the GOP elites and was taken for granted by them, my suggestions for Veep candidates are, in no particular order:

o Romney. Everybody’s screaming about the economy. He’s the finance guy.

o Lieberman. Pull in all the “centrist” libs, independents, and disaffected Hilary voters.

o Condi Rice. She has numerous excellent attributes and would be a terrific VP.

Then McCain has to hope that a lot of social conservatives don’t sit this one out and will go out and vote for him because he won’t do as much damage to this country as Obama would.

Mike Huckabee has three strong points. He is an excellent campainer. He wll help McCain bring the Social Conservatives into his camp. And he appeals to the working Republicans and Democrates i.e. he isn’t a “Country Club” Republican which will not sell this year.

John McCain should choose Mike Huckabee for five reasons. First, they work well together. Second, they agree on fundamental issues, such as the need to restore fiscal sanity in the government. Third, McCain is not a good debater, and will need someone who can out-talk Obama in the Presidential debates. Fourth, Huckabee has extensive executive experience, and will be able to take over immediately if needed. And finally, there is no way that McCain will be elected the next President unless Huckabee is on that ticket!

While I respect Mike Huckabee for his principled stances, the problem with him as VP is what the in-the-tank-for-any-democrat MSM will do with Huckabee as a VP choice–they will paint him as a mouth-breathing evangelical theocrat and try to leverage him as a balance to Obama’s Jeremiah Wright problems. Unfair and inaccurate? Yes, but isn’t that a fair and accurate description of the MSM? In the end, Huckabee can secure the conservative evangelical vote for McCain, but due to how he will be represented by the MSM, it will play negatively to the swing voters of independents and conservative-leaning democrats. Bottom Line: due to the MSM, Huckabee will produce a net negative of votes for McCain.

I think we’re going to find out what the media does if Mike Huckabee is named the running mate. Because if he isn’t, try saying “President Obama!”

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories